The French Existentialists: Sartre, de Beauvoir and Camus

5 MARCH 2025 · 1 HOUR 17 MINUTES · PHILOSOPHY · Season 2, Episode 32

Freedom, absurdity and radical responsibility: Sartre, de Beauvoir and Camus transformed existentialism into an argument about how human beings choose and act without guaranteed meaning.

Listen

Episode summary

The episode introduces Sartre’s distinction between being-in-itself and being-for-itself, his account of bad faith and the unsettling responsibility implied by the claim that existence precedes essence.

It then follows Simone de Beauvoir’s use of existentialist analysis to expose the social construction of woman as the Other, before turning to Camus’s defence of revolt, political freedom and moral limits. Their disagreements show that existentialism was never a single doctrine.

Questions explored

• What does Sartre mean by bad faith?
• How does de Beauvoir connect freedom to oppression and material independence?
• Why does Camus resist both nihilism and political absolutism?
• Can radical freedom support a shared ethics?

Participants

• Samuel Woodall: intellectual historian and co-host of Beyond the Text.
• Jack Thomson: philosopher and co-host of Beyond the Text.

Sources and further reading

• Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness (1943).
• Simone de Beauvoir, The Ethics of Ambiguity (1947).
• Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex (1949).
• Albert Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus (1942).
• Albert Camus, The Rebel (1951).

A complete transcript is available from the original Buzzsprout episode page where provided.