13 APRIL 2026 · 13 MINUTES · INTELLECTUAL HISTORY
Samuel Woodall presents his doctoral research on Rapin de Thoyras, the mixed constitution, moderation, and the emergence of political party as a necessary expression of post-Revolution English government.
Episode guide
- Why Rapin described England as neither a pure monarchy, aristocracy nor democracy
- How constitutional mixture created persistent political disagreement
- Why party could be understood as an expression of the constitution rather than simply its failure
- The movement from private research to public historical argument
Sources and further reading
- Paul de Rapin de Thoyras, A Dissertation on the Rise, Progress, Views, Strength, Interests, and Characters of the Two Parties of the Whigs and Tories (1717).
- Miriam Franchina, Paul Rapin Thoyras and the Art of Eighteenth-Century Historiography (2021).
- Max Skjönsberg, The Persistence of Party (2021).
Transcript
A full transcript is in preparation. This page provides an accessible summary and episode guide in the meantime.
Continue the conversation
- Read: Rapin—The Forgotten Historian of Party
- Discuss: When Does Opposition Become Loyal?
- Browse all podcast episodes
Cite this episode
Chicago style: Samuel Woodall, host, “Moderation and Memory: Rapin de Thoyras and the Making of English Party,” Beyond the Text, podcast audio, 13 min., April 13, 2026, https://open.spotify.com/episode/2wKyrng7CMW5fkHdP2mdhR.
